Incidence of Plate Removal and its Correlation to the Site of Injury in Patients with Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 16, 2021
https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds/2021/26745
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Volume 10, Issue 2, July 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Gopalakrishnan Venkatesa
Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indian Army, Jammu – 180003
Nandakishore Sahoo
Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indian Army, Jammu – 180003

Abstract

Background: Maxillofacial injuries can be classified according to its anatomical location of the involved bone and by the degree of involvement like simple, compound or comminuted. Regardless of the site of involvement and nature of trauma the fracture can be addressed by closed and open methods of reduction. Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to record the incidence and factors associated with plate removal in patients with maxillofacial trauma. Materials and Methods: Records of 280 cases managed for maxillofacial trauma in the last (5 years) period from January 2010 to Dec 2014 by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with osteosynthesis plates were analyzed at a tertiary health care facility. Logistic regression analysis was done to find an association between the variables studied and incidence of plate removal. Results: 32 cases (11.42%), 55 number of implants underwent removal of plates due to reasons ranging from infection(50%), Plate exposure(9.375%), treatment failure(15.625%), palpability(12.50%), and persistent pain(12.50%), Zygomatic buttress and Parasymphysis sites had highest incidence of plate removal compared to other sites. Being a female [OR 9.87(4.21–10.72)], age groups of 46-60 [OR 6.39(4.43-9.62)], 31-45 [OR 11.25(6.81-13.77)] and 15-30 [OR 10.01(5.74-12.22)], infra orbital rim among sites [OR 2.03 (1.48-4.67)] significantly increased the odds of incidence of plate removal. Conclusion: In our retrospective analysis, the overall incidence of plate removal was 11.42%. Maximum plate removals were from Zygomatico-Maxillary Buttress and Symphysis and Parasymphysis regions. Infection was found to be the most common cause of plate removal.  

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
How to Cite
Venkatesa, G., & Sahoo, N. (2021). Incidence of Plate Removal and its Correlation to the Site of Injury in Patients with Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2018–2023. https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds/2021/26745

References

  1. Champy M, Jaegar JH, Lodde JP, Muster D, Schmitt R. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via buccal approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1978; 6:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80062-9.
  2. Haug RH. Retention of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54:611–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S02782391(96)90644-8.
  3. Jackson IT, Adham MN. Metallic plate stabilisation of bonegrafts in craniofacial surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1986; 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(86)90044-5.
  4. von Domarus H. Stabilisation of the mandible by A.O. compression plate after mandibulotomy. Br J Plast Surg. 1981; 34:389–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(81)90042-4.
  5. Woodman JL, Black J, Nunamaker DM. Release of cobalt and nickel from a new total finger joint prosthesis made of vitallium. J Biomed Mater Res. 1983; 17:655–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820170410. PMid:6885845 .
  6. Blake GB, MacFarlane MR, Hinton JW. Titanium in reconstructive surgery of the skull and face. Br J Plast Surg. 1990; 43:528–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(90)90115G.
  7. Woodman JL, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO, Urban RM. Metal ion release from titanium-based prosthetic segmental replacements of long bones in baboons: A long-term study. J Orthop Res 1984;1:421-30.
  8. Manor Y, Chaushu G, Taicher S. Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57:6790–82. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90430-5.
  9. Islamoglu K, Coskunfirat OK, Tetik G, Ozgentas HE. Complications and removal rates of miniplates and screws used for maxillofacial fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 48:265–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-20020300000006. PMid:11862030 .
  10. Iizuka T, Lindqvist C. Rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures. An analysis of 270 fractures treated using the AO/ ASIF method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 21:65–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80533-8.
  11. Brown JS, Trotter M, Cliffe J, Ward-Booth RP, Williams ED. The fate of miniplates in facial trauma and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989; 27: 306–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/02664356(89)90043-0.
  12. Moberg L-E, Nordenram Å, Kjellman O. Metal release from plates used in jaw fracture treatment. A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989; 18: 311–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(89)80102-X.
  13. Breme J, Steinhäuser E, Paulus G. Commercially pure titanium Steinhäuser plate-screw system for maxillofacial surgery. Biomaterials. 1988; 9:310–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(88)90024-5.
  14. Rosenberg A, Grätz KW, Sailer HF. Should titanium miniplates be removed after bone healing is complete? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 22:185–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0901-5027(05)80249-8.
  15. Bhatt V, Langford RJ. Removal of miniplates in maxillofacialsurgery: University hospital birmingham experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:553–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/ joms.2003.50108. PMid:12730833 .
  16. Mosbah MR, Oloyede D, Koppel DA, Moos KF, Stenhouse D. Miniplate removal in trauma and orthognathic surgery-a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32:148–51. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0344. PMid:12729774 .
  17. Bhatt V, Chhabra P, Dover MS. Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: a follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:756–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.005. PMid:15944970 .
  18. George R, Constantinos M, Veronika P, et al. Reasons for miniplate removal following maxillofacial trauma: a 4-year study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006; 34:435–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.001. PMid:16963270.
  19. Bakathir AA, Manjunath V, Mohammed I. Removal of bone plates in patients with maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.006. PMid:18329911.