Role of Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 14, 2023
https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds/2023/646
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2023

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mahima Panwar
Junior Resident (III), Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, K D Dental College, Mathura – 281121, Uttar Pradesh
Sonal Gupta
Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, K D Dental College, Mathura – 281121, Uttar Pradesh
Utkarsh Singh
Junior Resident (I), Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, K D Dental College, Mathura – 281121, Uttar Pradesh
Asmita Das
Junior Resident (III), Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, K D Dental College, Mathura – 281121, Uttar Pradesh
Simran Isha
1Junior Resident (III), Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, K D Dental College, Mathura – 281121, Uttar Pradesh

Abstract

Intraoral Scanners (IOS) are devices which are used for capturing direct optical impressions in dentistry. They are handheld devices used to directly create digital impression data of the oral cavity. Light source from the scanner is projected onto the scan objects, such as full dental arches, and then a 3D model processed by the scanning software will be displayed in real-time on a touch screen. Pediatric dental patients requiring dental prostheses is considered the most challenging for dental professionals owing to managing the children’s behavioural problems, gagging reflex, foreign body aspiration, and choking (breathing) concerns. The conventional impression-making procedures in young children are regarded as quite cumbersome and difficult due to several clinical factors in dentistry. Pediatric dentistry is evolving to minimise the disadvantages of traditional techniques by introducing advanced digital intraoral scanners in the field of pediatric dentistry. Thus this paper reviews the application of intraoral scanners in pediatric dentistry.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Received 2023-02-07
Accepted 2023-02-27
Published 2023-03-14
How to Cite
Panwar, M., Gupta, S. ., Singh, U. ., Das, A. ., & Isha, S. . (2023). Role of Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry. International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, 12(1), 2071–2076. https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds/2023/646

References

  1. Yilmaz H, Aydin MN. Digital versus conventional impression method in children: Comfort, preference and time. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019; 29:728 35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ipd.12566 PMid:31348834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12566
  2. Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, et al. A review of 3D printing in dentistry: Technologies, affecting factors, and applications. Scanning. 2021; 2021:9950131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131 PMid:34367410 PMCid:PMC8313360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
  3. Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, Mangano C, Mangano F. Conventional versus digital impressions: Acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients. Open Dent J. 2018; 12:118 24. https://doi. org/10.2174/1874210601812010118 PMid:29492177 PMCid:PMC5815028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010118
  4. Khan MK. Modern digital pediatric dentistry with the advent of intraoral sensors, Computer-Aided Design/ Computer-Aided manufacturing, and three-dimensional printing technologies: A comprehensive review Article. Journal of Dental Research and Review. 2022; 9(3):195-201.
  5. Braian M, Wennerberg A. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-36.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent. 2018.10.007 PMid:30885584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.007
  6. Stavroula Michou, et al. Automated caries detection in vivo using a 3D intraoral scanner. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11:21276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00259-w PMid:34711853 PMCid:PMC8553860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00259-w
  7. Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: A review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017:8427595. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8427595 PMid:29065652 PMCid:PMC5605789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8427595
  8. Guo H, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Liu H. Computer-aided design of polyetheretherketone for application to removable pediatric space maintainers. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20:201. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01184-6 PMid:32650758 PMCid:PMC7353737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01184-6
  9. Patel J, Winters J, Walters M. Intraoral digital impression technique for a neonate with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019; 56:1120 3. https://doi. org/10.1177/1055665619835082 PMid:30857398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619835082
  10. Beretta M, Federici Canova F, Gianolio A, Mangano A, Paglia M, Colombo S, et al. Zero Expander: Metal free automatic palatal expansion for special needs patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021; 22:151 4.
  11. Sánchez Riofrío D, Viñas MJ, Ustrell Torrent JM. CBCT and CAD CAM technology to design a minimally invasive maxillary expander. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20:303. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01292-3 PMid:33148234 PMCid:PMC7641819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01292-3
  12. Roser C, Hodecker LD, Koebel C, Lux CJ, Ruckes D, Rues S, et al. Mechanical properties of CAD/CAM fabricated in comparison to conventionally fabricated functional regulator 3 appliances. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:14719. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94237-x PMid:34282228 PMCid:PMC8290040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94237-x
  13. Marcel R, Reinhard H, Andreas K. Accuracy of CAD/ CAM fabricated bite splints: Milling vs. 3D printing. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24:4607 15 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784- 020-03329-x PMid:32436163 PMCid:PMC7666673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03329-x
  14. Marty M, Broutin A, Vergnes JN, Vaysse F. Comparison of student’s perceptions between 3D printed models versus series models in paediatric dentistry hands-on session. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019; 23:68 72. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12404 PMid:30383320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12404
  15. Tiwari S, Kulkarni P, Rathi SV, Abraham JM, Agrawal N, Kumar A. 3D printing: A silver lining in pediatric dentistry. Nat Volatiles Essent Oils. 2021; 8:11582 91.
  16. Lopez CD, Witek L, Torroni A, Flores RL, Demissie DB, Young S, et al. The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Res 2018; 110:1055 64. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1345 PMid:29781248 PMCid:PMC6117201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1345
  17. Nasef AA, El Beialy AR, Mostafa YA. Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146:394 8. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.025 PMid:25172262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.025
  18. Vij AA, Reddy A. Using digital impressions to fabricate space maintainers: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2020; 8:1274 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.2848 PMid:32695374 PMCid:PMC7364089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.2848
  19. Scribante A, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Canzi P, Marconi S, Montasser MA, et al. Properties of CAD/CAM 3D printing dental materials and their clinical applications in orthodontics: Where are we now? Appl Sci. 2022; 12:551. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020551
  20. Ul Huqh MZ, et al. A current update on the use of intraoral scanners in dentistry- A review of literature. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2022 May; 15(3).